Message 140785 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	abingham
Recipients	Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date	2011-07-21.05:40:27
SpamBayes Score	2.7215452e-12
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<CAEZidR11=Jfuf0QhUydittsgX+2wqaTP1kYZGHS5dJCgGtUBxg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1311170602.01.0.108817720696.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
OK, I created issue 12600 for dealing with parameterized TestCases as opposed to individual tests. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:03 PM, R. David Murray <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Unless someone sees a clever way to implement both with the same mechanism, parameterizing test cases should probably be a separate issue. Doing it via subclassing is straightforward, which also argues for a separate issue, since an 'is this worth it' discussion should be done separately for that feature.

OK, I created issue 12600 for dealing with parameterized TestCases as
opposed to individual tests.

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:03 PM, R. David Murray <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Unless someone sees a clever way to implement both with the same mechanism, parameterizing test cases should probably be a separate issue.  Doing it via subclassing is straightforward, which also argues for a separate issue, since an 'is this worth it' discussion should be done separately for that feature.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-07-21 05:40:28	abingham	set	recipients: + abingham, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, nchauvat, eric.snow
2011-07-21 05:40:27	abingham	link	issue7897 messages
2011-07-21 05:40:27	abingham	create