Message 141539 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	benjamin.peterson
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, eric.snow, gsakkis, marco.mariani, maxbublis, michael.foord, ncoghlan
Date	2011-08-01.22:36:14
SpamBayes Score	0.00021012154
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1312238175.17.0.219435333501.issue8639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I'm -0.5. I think the current patch makes too many assumptions for the caller. For example, someone calling a class may really desire __new__'s signature, not that of __init__. Moreover, conceptually, getargspec() returns the argspec of a directly callable function or method.

I'm -0.5. I think the current patch makes too many assumptions for the caller. For example, someone calling a class may really desire __new__'s signature, not that of __init__. Moreover, conceptually, getargspec() returns the argspec of a directly callable *function* or *method*.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-08-01 22:36:15	benjamin.peterson	set	recipients: + benjamin.peterson, ncoghlan, gsakkis, eric.araujo, michael.foord, daniel.urban, marco.mariani, eric.snow, maxbublis
2011-08-01 22:36:15	benjamin.peterson	set	messageid: <1312238175.17.0.219435333501.issue8639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-08-01 22:36:14	benjamin.peterson	link	issue8639 messages
2011-08-01 22:36:14	benjamin.peterson	create