Message 217396 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	ezio.melotti, nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, skip.montanaro, tiwilliam
Date	2014-04-28.18:59:42
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1398711580.2393.7.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to	<CAH_1eM3Ffgt+wvpOHze6mUD7Tubz4QZBwGs5u81fp2JrZbNc3g@mail.gmail.com>

Content
> Sure, it might not be optimal for compressed files, but I gues that > the optimal value is function of the compression-level block size and > many other factors which are just too varied to come up with a > reasonable heuristic. Well, I think that compressed files in general would benefit from a larger buffer size than plain binary I/O, but that's just a hunch.

> Sure, it might not be optimal for compressed files, but I gues that
> the optimal value is function of the compression-level block size and
> many other factors which are just too varied to come up with a
> reasonable heuristic.

Well, I think that compressed files in general would benefit from a
larger buffer size than plain binary I/O, but that's just a hunch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-04-28 18:59:42	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, neologix, serhiy.storchaka, tiwilliam
2014-04-28 18:59:42	pitrou	link	issue20962 messages
2014-04-28 18:59:42	pitrou	create