Message 222197 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ezio.melotti
Recipients	andymaier, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi, terry.reedy, tshepang
Date	2014-07-03.16:07:44
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1404403664.17.0.124113444108.issue14050@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> Why do the patches attached to this issue not have a "review" link? because > both (2.7 and 3.2) patches do not line up with the current > 2.7 and 3.x tip, both hunks get rejected. The "review" link only appears if the patch applies cleanly on the "default" branch. Preparing a new patch against "default" should make the link appear.

> Why do the patches attached to this issue not have a "review" link?

because

> both (2.7 and 3.2) patches do not line up with the current
> 2.7 and 3.x tip, both hunks get rejected.

The "review" link only appears if the patch applies cleanly on the "default" branch.  Preparing a new patch against "default" should make the link appear.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-07-03 16:07:44	ezio.melotti	set	recipients: + ezio.melotti, terry.reedy, eric.araujo, sandro.tosi, docs@python, tshepang, andymaier
2014-07-03 16:07:44	ezio.melotti	set	messageid: <1404403664.17.0.124113444108.issue14050@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-03 16:07:44	ezio.melotti	link	issue14050 messages
2014-07-03 16:07:44	ezio.melotti	create