Message 250096 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	alecsandru.patrascu, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, larry, pitrou, scoder, skip.montanaro, skrah
Date	2015-09-07.10:41:12
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1441622472.8.0.502580679526.issue24915@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
As for the dual 2.7/3.6 aspect: I don't really understand it. If this is committed to 2.7 it should also be committed to 3.5. It doesn't threaten the stability of the interpreter in any way, given it does not affect the default build path. There's no reason why packagers of Python 3.5 should have to separately maintain a patch to have access to this improvement.

As for the dual 2.7/3.6 aspect: I don't really understand it. If this is committed to 2.7 it should also be committed to 3.5. It doesn't threaten the stability of the interpreter in any way, given it does not affect the default build path. There's no reason why packagers of Python 3.5 should have to separately maintain a patch to have access to this improvement.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-09-07 10:41:12	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, scoder, larry, skrah, alecsandru.patrascu
2015-09-07 10:41:12	pitrou	set	messageid: <1441622472.8.0.502580679526.issue24915@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-09-07 10:41:12	pitrou	link	issue24915 messages
2015-09-07 10:41:12	pitrou	create