Message 254303 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	abarry
Recipients	abarry, docs@python, eric.smith, jayvdb
Date	2015-11-07.22:04:25
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1446933866.12.0.471415008286.issue25179@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I was under the impression that they would work without any additional work (as they'd have access to the outer scope). Of course, trying to access a local variable would be an error as it's not yet defined. My point is more that we shouldn't have to account for such a small case - if they can be used, then let them be used, and if they can't, then don't (unless the modification is straightforward, which it might not be).

I was under the impression that they would work without any additional work (as they'd have access to the outer scope). Of course, trying to access a local variable would be an error as it's not yet defined.

My point is more that we shouldn't have to account for such a small case - if they can be used, then let them be used, and if they can't, then don't (unless the modification is straightforward, which it might not be).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-11-07 22:04:26	abarry	set	recipients: + abarry, eric.smith, docs@python, jayvdb
2015-11-07 22:04:26	abarry	set	messageid: <1446933866.12.0.471415008286.issue25179@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-11-07 22:04:26	abarry	link	issue25179 messages
2015-11-07 22:04:25	abarry	create