Message 261028 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	Sriram Rajagopalan, belopolsky, gregory.p.smith
Date	2016-02-29.22:54:41
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1456786481.55.0.114298759742.issue26460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> Python's time.strptime() behavior is consistent with that of glibc 2.19 Gregory, I believe OP is complaining about the way datetime.datetime.strptime() behaves, not time.strptime() which is mentioned as (preferred?) alternative. See msg261015 in issue 14157 for context.

> Python's time.strptime() behavior is consistent with that of glibc 2.19

Gregory,

I believe OP is complaining about the way datetime.datetime.strptime() behaves, not time.strptime() which is mentioned as (preferred?) alternative.


See msg261015  in issue 14157 for context.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-02-29 22:54:41	belopolsky	set	recipients: + belopolsky, gregory.p.smith, Sriram Rajagopalan
2016-02-29 22:54:41	belopolsky	set	messageid: <1456786481.55.0.114298759742.issue26460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-02-29 22:54:41	belopolsky	link	issue26460 messages
2016-02-29 22:54:41	belopolsky	create