Message 264018 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	Yury.Selivanov, casevh, josh.r, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner, yselivanov, zbyrne
Date	2016-04-22.14:05:45
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1461333945.44.0.88161417026.issue21955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Maybe we should adopt a difference approach. There is something called "inline caching": put the cache between instructions, in the same memory block. Example of paper on CPython: "Efficient Inline Caching without Dynamic Translation" by Stefan Brunthaler (2009) https://www.sba-research.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/sac10.pdf Maybe we can build something on top of the issue #26219 "implement per-opcode cache in ceval"?

Maybe we should adopt a difference approach.

There is something called "inline caching": put the cache between instructions, in the same memory block. Example of paper on CPython:

"Efficient Inline Caching without Dynamic Translation" by Stefan Brunthaler (2009)
https://www.sba-research.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/sac10.pdf

Maybe we can build something on top of the issue #26219 "implement per-opcode cache in ceval"?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-04-22 14:05:46	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, lemburg, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, casevh, skrah, Yury.Selivanov, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, josh.r, zbyrne
2016-04-22 14:05:45	vstinner	set	messageid: <1461333945.44.0.88161417026.issue21955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-04-22 14:05:45	vstinner	link	issue21955 messages
2016-04-22 14:05:45	vstinner	create