Message 304343 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	orent, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2017-10-13.15:14:13
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1507907653.3.0.213398074469.issue30156@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Note: if you care of namedtuple performance, Raymond Hettinger wrote that he would be interested to reuse the C structseq sequence. I measured that getting an attribute by name is faster in structseq than with the current property cached tuple hack.

Note: if you care of namedtuple performance, Raymond Hettinger wrote that he would be interested to reuse the C structseq sequence. I measured that getting an attribute by name is faster in structseq than with the current property cached tuple hack.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-10-13 15:14:13	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, orent, serhiy.storchaka
2017-10-13 15:14:13	vstinner	set	messageid: <1507907653.3.0.213398074469.issue30156@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-13 15:14:13	vstinner	link	issue30156 messages
2017-10-13 15:14:13	vstinner	create