Message 339574 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	koobs, ncoghlan, ned.deily, vstinner
Date	2019-04-07.11:58:09
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1554638289.4.0.136795357667.issue34589@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
I'm inclined to leave 3.7 alone unless/until we get an actual bug report for the current behaviour - if an embedder finds that it just straight up doesn't work for them, then they can either resort to tinkering with the private APIs (since they won't change until Python 3.8, and at that point we expect to have a public API available), or else stick with Python 3.6 until later this year when Python 3.8 is available.

I'm inclined to leave 3.7 alone unless/until we get an actual bug report for the current behaviour - if an embedder finds that it just straight up doesn't work for them, then they can either resort to tinkering with the private APIs (since they won't change until Python 3.8, and at that point we expect to have a public API available), or else stick with Python 3.6 until later this year when Python 3.8 is available.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-04-07 11:58:09	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, vstinner, ned.deily, koobs
2019-04-07 11:58:09	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1554638289.4.0.136795357667.issue34589@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-04-07 11:58:09	ncoghlan	link	issue34589 messages
2019-04-07 11:58:09	ncoghlan	create