Message 340942 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jdemeyer
Recipients	eric.snow, jdemeyer, vstinner
Date	2019-04-26.21:03:51
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1556312631.96.0.58634863819.issue36710@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
> It's wrong to share a single gc state between two interpreters And what's your solution for that? I'm not asking for a complete ready-to-implement answer, but at least a basic idea. Otherwise it's impossible for me to judge whether your PR 12934 helps with that or not. Basically I would like to see something like PEP 579 but for this problem.

> It's wrong to share a single gc state between two interpreters

And what's your solution for that? I'm not asking for a complete ready-to-implement answer, but at least a basic idea. Otherwise it's impossible for me to judge whether your PR 12934 helps with that or not.

Basically I would like to see something like PEP 579 but for this problem.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-04-26 21:03:51	jdemeyer	set	recipients: + jdemeyer, vstinner, eric.snow
2019-04-26 21:03:51	jdemeyer	set	messageid: <1556312631.96.0.58634863819.issue36710@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-04-26 21:03:51	jdemeyer	link	issue36710 messages
2019-04-26 21:03:51	jdemeyer	create