Message 360399 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nanjekyejoannah
Recipients	Valentyn Tymofieiev, brett.cannon, eric.snow, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, p-ganssle, pablogsal, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2020-01-21.14:14:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1579616067.52.0.12529655542.issue35943@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
> Do you mean that there is a risk that the backport introduces a regression in another part of the code? If yes, I would suggest to not backport the change to stable branches. My worry are the many changes that are required to ceval to make this back port work. Not that I think we can not successfully backport things. we can.

> Do you mean that there is a risk that the backport introduces a regression in another part of the code? If yes, I would suggest to not backport the change to *stable* branches.

My worry are the many changes that are required to ceval to make this back port work. Not that I think we can not successfully backport things. we can.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-01-21 14:14:27	nanjekyejoannah	set	recipients: + nanjekyejoannah, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.snow, p-ganssle, pablogsal, Valentyn Tymofieiev
2020-01-21 14:14:27	nanjekyejoannah	set	messageid: <1579616067.52.0.12529655542.issue35943@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-01-21 14:14:27	nanjekyejoannah	link	issue35943 messages
2020-01-21 14:14:27	nanjekyejoannah	create