Message 366579 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	eelizondo
Recipients	carljm, corona10, dino.viehland, eelizondo, gregory.p.smith, nascheme, pablogsal, pitrou, shihai1991, steve.dower, tim.peters, vstinner
Date	2020-04-16.04:42:52
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1587012173.18.0.840304478339.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
After the added optimizations and assuming that running this more rigorously (i.e PGO + LTO + full cpu isolation + speed.python.org machine) also shows the PR as perf neutral, what are people's thoughts so far? Would this be enough to consider adding this change by default? Are there still any concerns regarding correctness? It seems like most of the questions raised so far have already been addressed

After the added optimizations and assuming that running this more rigorously (i.e PGO + LTO + full cpu isolation + speed.python.org machine) also shows the PR as perf neutral, what are people's thoughts so far?

Would this be enough to consider adding this change by default?

Are there still any concerns regarding correctness? It seems like most of the questions raised so far have already been addressed

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-04-16 04:42:53	eelizondo	set	recipients: + eelizondo, tim.peters, nascheme, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, carljm, dino.viehland, steve.dower, corona10, pablogsal, shihai1991
2020-04-16 04:42:53	eelizondo	set	messageid: <1587012173.18.0.840304478339.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-04-16 04:42:53	eelizondo	link	issue40255 messages
2020-04-16 04:42:52	eelizondo	create