Message 64119 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	Rhamphoryncus, belopolsky, duncanb, facundobatista, terry.reedy
Date	2008-03-19.23:07:17
SpamBayes Score	0.3021158
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1205968039.16.0.354623514602.issue2417@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Attached patch fixes the cases discovered so far. It is possible that in some of these cases creation of the long object that is later discarded can be avoided by detecting small int return early, but such optimizations should probably be left for later. Any advise on how to write a unit test? Should the unit test detect python compiled with NSMALLNEGINTS + NSMALLPOSINTS == 0 and disable identity checks?

Attached patch fixes the cases discovered so far.  It is possible that 
in some of these cases creation of the long object that is later 
discarded can be avoided by detecting small int return early, but such 
optimizations should probably be left for later.

Any advise on how to write a unit test?  Should the unit test detect 
python compiled with NSMALLNEGINTS + NSMALLPOSINTS == 0 and disable 
identity checks?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-03-19 23:07:19	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.302116 -> 0.3021158 recipients: + belopolsky, duncanb, terry.reedy, facundobatista, Rhamphoryncus
2008-03-19 23:07:19	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.302116 -> 0.302116 messageid: <1205968039.16.0.354623514602.issue2417@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-03-19 23:07:18	belopolsky	link	issue2417 messages
2008-03-19 23:07:18	belopolsky	create