Message 77869 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, catlee, erik.stephens, guettli, jribbens, lemburg, pitrou, skip.montanaro, srittau, steve.roberts, tim.peters, tomster, vstinner
Date	2008-12-15.14:18:42
SpamBayes Score	0.01131952
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1229350724.8.0.821454996458.issue1673409@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
What you say is "with 99500 days or more, the microsecond error is bigger than 90%". It means that with epoch starting at 1970, you can still return timestamps with a 1-2 microsecond accuracy for the year 2242. Additional precision would be overkill.

What you say is "with 99500 days or more, the microsecond error is
bigger than 90%". It means that with epoch starting at 1970, you can
still return timestamps with a 1-2 microsecond accuracy for the year 2242.

Additional precision would be overkill.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-12-15 14:18:45	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, lemburg, tim.peters, skip.montanaro, brett.cannon, jribbens, srittau, guettli, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, catlee, vstinner, tomster, erik.stephens, steve.roberts
2008-12-15 14:18:44	pitrou	set	messageid: <1229350724.8.0.821454996458.issue1673409@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-12-15 14:18:43	pitrou	link	issue1673409 messages
2008-12-15 14:18:42	pitrou	create