Message 89327 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, conf, ncoghlan, pitrou, trott
Date	2009-06-13.12:40:17
SpamBayes Score	9.38099e-08
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1244896961.4913.13.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to	<1244895711.39.0.726471986274.issue5811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
We could, however, enforce the passed argument and only return the whole remaining buffer when no argument is given. This is a bit like Frederick Reeve's proposal on python-dev, but less sophisticated and therefore less tedious to implement. In any case, I'm not sure it should be committed before the 3.1 release. The second and last release candidate is supposed to be today.

We could, however, enforce the passed argument and only return the whole
remaining buffer when no argument is given. This is a bit like Frederick
Reeve's proposal on python-dev, but less sophisticated and therefore
less tedious to implement.

In any case, I'm not sure it should be committed before the 3.1 release.
The second and last release candidate is supposed to be today.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-06-13 12:40:20	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, trott, conf
2009-06-13 12:40:17	pitrou	link	issue5811 messages
2009-06-13 12:40:17	pitrou	create