Message 95146 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	draghuram
Recipients	alexandre.vassalotti, draghuram, gvanrossum, isandler, stephbul
Date	2009-11-11.18:49:43
SpamBayes Score	7.2315215e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<2c51ecee0911111049y244730a0rc2aab0ec3605dd44@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1257729724.99.0.486336497157.issue1294@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Ilya Sandler <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Is not this patch backward incompatible? > > E.g any cmd-based application which expects Ctrl-C to propagate to the > top level will be broken by this patch. But currently, CTRL-C terminates the session instead of propagating upstream. The only way it would do so is if do_KeyboardInterrupt() is implemented in which case, the behaviour would remain same even with the patch.

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Ilya Sandler <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

> Is not this patch backward incompatible?
>
> E.g any cmd-based application which expects Ctrl-C to propagate to the
> top level will be broken by this patch.

But currently, CTRL-C terminates the session instead of propagating
upstream. The only way it would do so is if do_KeyboardInterrupt() is
implemented in which case, the behaviour would remain same even with
the patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-11-11 18:49:47	draghuram	set	recipients: + draghuram, gvanrossum, isandler, alexandre.vassalotti, stephbul
2009-11-11 18:49:44	draghuram	link	issue1294 messages
2009-11-11 18:49:44	draghuram	create