◐ Shell
reader mode source ↗
Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
German philosopher (1863–1936)
Heinrich Rickert
Born
Heinrich John Rickert

(1863-05-25)25 May 1863
Died25 July 1936(1936-07-25) (aged 73)
FatherH. E. Rickert
Education
EducationUniversity of Berlin
University of Strasbourg (PhD, 1888)
University of Freiburg (Dr. phil. hab., 1891)
ThesisZur Lehre von der Definition (On the Theory of Definition) (1888)
Wilhelm Windelband (PhD advisor)
Alois Riehl (Dr. phil. hab. advisor)
Other advisor
Friedrich Paulsen
Philosophical work
Era19th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
Neo-Kantianism (Baden school)
InstitutionsUniversity of Freiburg (1894–1915)
University of Heidelberg (1915–1932)
Doctoral students
Bruno Bauch
Martin Heidegger
Richard Kroner
Notable students
Walter Benjamin
Rudolf Carnap
Emil Lask
Main interests
Epistemology, metaphysics
Notable ideas
Qualitative distinction between historical and scientific facts
Distinction between knowing (kennen) and cognizing (erkennen)[1]

Heinrich John Rickert (; German: [ˈʁɪkɐt]; 25 May 1863 – 25 July 1936) was a German philosopher, a leading neo-Kantian of the Baden school.

Life

[edit]

Rickert was born in Danzig, Prussia (now Gdańsk, Poland) to the journalist and later politician Heinrich Edwin Rickert and Annette née Stoddart. He was professor of philosophy at the University of Freiburg (1894–1915, succeeded by Edmund Husserl) and the University of Heidelberg (1915–1932, succeeding Wilhelm Windelband). He died in Heidelberg amid Nazi Germany.

Despite his earlier support for Jewish philosophers, Rickert later embraced National Socialism.[2]

Philosophy

[edit]

Rickert is known for his discussion of a qualitative distinction between historical and scientific facts.[3] He also argued (against Wilhelm Dilthey, Georg Simmel, and the anti-rationalist philosophers of life) that only someone who takes a purely theoretical standpoint can reflect on the world as a whole.[2]

Rickert's philosophy was an important influence on the work of sociologist Max Weber, who borrowed much of his methodology, including the concept of the ideal type. Philosopher Martin Heidegger began his academic career as Rickert's assistant, graduating and writing his habilitation thesis under Rickert.[4]

Charles R. Bambach writes:

In his work Rickert, like Dilthey, intended to offer a unifying theory of knowledge which, although accepting a division between science and history or Natur and Geist, overcame this division in a new philosophical method. For Dilthey the method was wedded to hermeneutics; for Rickert it was the transcendental method of Kant.[5]

In addition, Rickert's Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung was cited by the Kantian scholar Lewis White Beck as a major source of inspiration during his early studies as an undergraduate with Leroy Loemker.[6]

Rickert and Windelband led the Baden school of neo-Kantians.

Works

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. Heinrich Rickert, "Knowing and Cognizing: Critical Remarks on Theoretical Intuitionism," in The Neo-Kantian Reader: An Anthology of Key Texts. Edited by Sebastian Luft. New York/London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 384–395.
  2. 1 2 Staiti, Andrea. "Heinrich Rickert". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 1095-5054. OCLC 429049174.
  3. Rickert, Heinrich (1912). "Lebenswerte und Kulturwerte". Logos: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie der Kultur. 2: 131–166.
  4. Sebastian Luft (ed.), The Neo-Kantian Reader, Routledge 2015, p. 461.
  5. Bambach, Charles R. Heidegger, Dilthey and the Crisis of Historicism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995. 30
  6. Falling in Love With Wisdom, ed. by David D. Karnos, Robert G. Shoemaker, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993, pp. 13–15: "How I became Almost a Philosopher" by Lewis White Beck.

References

[edit]
  • Christian Krijnen. Nachmetaphysischer Sinn. Eine problemgeschichtliche und systematische Studie zu den Prinzipien der Wertphilosophie Heinrich Rickerts. Würzburg 2001. ISBN 3-8260-2020-0.
  • Dewalque, Arnaud. Être et jugement. La fondation de l’ontologie chez Heinrich Rickert, Hildesheim: Georg Olms, coll. « Europaea Memoria », 2010. ISBN 9783487143040.
  • Kupriyanov V. "Teleology as a method of historical cognition in H. Rickert's philosophy," SGEM2015 Conference Proceedings, 2015 (Vol. 1, Book 3, pp. 697–702).
  • Mayeda, Graham. 2008. "Is there a Method to Chance? Contrasting Kuki Shūzō’s Phenomenological Methodology in The Problem of Contingency with that of his Contemporaries Wilhelm Windelband and Heinrich Rickert." In Victor S. Hori and Melissa Anne-Marie Curley (eds.), Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy II: Neglected Themes and Hidden Variations (Nagoya, Japan: Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture).
  • Zijderveld, Anton C. Rickert's Relevance. The Ontological Nature and Epistemological Functions of Values. Leiden, Brill 2006. ISBN 978-90-04-15173-4.
[edit]