{{ message }}
bpo-35207: Disallow expressions like (a) = 42#10444
Closed
pablogsal wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
pablogsal
force-pushed
the
bpo-35207
branch
5 times, most recently
from
105ea96 to
dddf42e
Compare
November 10, 2018 05:46
As commented initially in bpo-33878, the fact that expressions like (x) = 42 are accepted is, in reality, an implementation detail and they should be disallowed.
Member
Author
|
I am not sure what to do with the annotated assignment as in exec('X: int; Z: str = "Z"; (w): complex = 1j', ns)def f2bad():
(no_such_global): int
print(no_such_global) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Member
|
We should not do this. See the issue. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
Assignees
4 participants
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
As commented initially in bpo-33878, the fact that expressions like
(x) = 42 are accepted is, in reality, an implementation detail and
they should be disallowed.
I am not sure if this is the cleanest/simplest implementation...if you think there is a better way to do this I am happy to change the Pull Request :)
https://bugs.python.org/issue35207