@terryjreedy, this is a bugfix and I really think it should go into 3.6 before it's too late. Would you like to review this or can I just merge it?

It is semi too late in that the rcs are already out. We would have to commit to 3.8 and 3.7.2+ and request cherry-pick to the two release branches. However, the plural issue is not critical, and as I said on issue, I don't necessarily consider reporting logical lines to be a bug. If I have misunderstood the issue, please clarify.

Example: >>> print(200*(70*'a'+'\n'))
Squeezed text 200 lines. Unsqueeze, narrow window till wrap. Squeeze. still 200 (logical) lines. This is ok with me, though I might add something to doc. If we do decide to change, it does not strike me now as a release blocker.

At the moment, I cannot make any changes, or even make an inline comment. Same as for #11214.
Edit: fixed by switching to MS Edge.

@terryjreedy, thanks for the review and improvements!

I have a few comments, let me know what you think.

Thanks @taleinat for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

GH-11305 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.