{{ message }}
gh-105751: Remove obsolete object base class in some ctypes tests#107460
Merged
ambv merged 1 commit intoJul 31, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closed
ambv
added
skip news
needs backport to 3.11
only security fixes
needs backport to 3.12
labels
Jul 31, 2023
Contributor
|
Sorry, @tomasr8 and @ambv, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Contributor
|
Sorry, @tomasr8 and @ambv, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry, something went wrong.
ambv
pushed a commit
to ambv/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
…types tests (pythonGH-107460) (cherry picked from commit 520efec) Co-authored-by: Tomas R <tomas.roun8@gmail.com>
ambv
pushed a commit
to ambv/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
…types tests (pythonGH-107460) (cherry picked from commit 520efec) Co-authored-by: Tomas R <tomas.roun8@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Some classes in the
ctypestests still explicitly inherit fromobjectwhich is a relic from Python 2.Let's remove them. (This is a simple change so I think that a separate issue is not necessary?)