I just did another pull request to fix the sentence.  Let me know if you want me to do that other change. I am working tomorrow anyway. I am eager to contribute, as I work with Machine Learning / AI stuff and business process automation, and so I have ideas about more advanced stuff to contribute (i.e., to things like openpyxl and python-pptx and natural language processing), but I realize I have to start with the easy stuff and then work my way up. John D. McDonald PJ Consulting LLCPh.      1-312-945-3518Mobile 1-312-479-2854 On Saturday, December 30, 2023 at 10:49:35 PM CST, Stanley ***@***.***> wrote: @slateny commented on this pull request. In Doc/reference/compound_stmts.rst:

Support for forward references within annotations by preserving annotations in a string form at runtime instead of eager evaluation. + :pep:`318` - Decorators for Functions and Methods + Function and method decorators were introduced. LGTM as well, thanks. Optionally, it might be useful to mirror the "Class definitions" section and also reference PEP 3129 under the "Function definitions" block with something like ⬇️ Suggested change- Function and method decorators were introduced. + Function and method decorators were introduced. Class decorators were introduced in :pep:`3129`. I'll let Hugo decide whether that addition's useful or not 🙂 Since we're changing this section anyways, on line 1365 there's a missing period after variables and instance variables that my suggestion can't quite reach. If you could give that a quick fix, that'd be great too! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

Ok, I think (hope) I did this correctly.  See below.  Another reason for volunteering is I am hoping to improve my Github skills.  Like I didn't even know you could do more than one commit per pull request. John D. McDonald PJ Consulting LLCPh.      1-312-945-3518Mobile 1-312-479-2854 On Sunday, December 31, 2023 at 09:21:40 AM CST, Hugo van Kemenade ***@***.***> wrote: @hugovk commented on this pull request. In Doc/reference/compound_stmts.rst:

Support for forward references within annotations by preserving annotations in a string form at runtime instead of eager evaluation. + :pep:`318` - Decorators for Functions and Methods + Function and method decorators were introduced. Sure, let's include this. @Rasputin2 Please could you add that? You can click the "Commit suggestion" button to apply this. And add the period as a new commit in this PR, rather than a new one. Thanks! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

I believe I accepted these changes as part of the same PR.  So, I think this is done, unless you guys disagree. John D. McDonald PJ Consulting LLCPh.      1-312-945-3518Mobile 1-312-479-2854 On Monday, January 1, 2024 at 03:08:05 AM CST, Hugo van Kemenade ***@***.***> wrote: @hugovk commented on this pull request. In Doc/reference/compound_stmts.rst:

:pep:`563` - Postponed Evaluation of Annotations Support for forward references within annotations by preserving annotations in a string form at runtime instead of eager evaluation. + :pep:`318` - Decorators for Functions and Methods + Function and method decorators were introduced. Please add this bit: ⬇️ Suggested change- Function and method decorators were introduced. + Function and method decorators were introduced. + Class decorators were introduced in :pep:`3129`. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>