gh-115942: Add locked to several multiprocessing locks#115944
Conversation
Co-authored-by: mpage <mpage@cs.stanford.edu>
|
FWIW this PR makes sense to me. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Ok, then I will add all the missing details. Thanks a lot! 👍 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
vstinner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add tests on threading.RLock.locked().
Sorry, something went wrong.
picnixz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just some rewording. Otherwise, once tests requested by Victor are added, LGTM.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
vstinner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
gpshead
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wish I could object to this being a locked() method instead of a .locked property... but this is matching an existing ancient API on purpose so... LGTM.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks everyone! 🎉 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
TODO:
AcquirerProxyobject has no attributelocked#115942