{{ message }}
[3.12] gh-119213: Fix getargs.c to store state in InterpreterState...#119194
Closed
1st1 wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
[3.12] gh-119213: Fix getargs.c to store state in InterpreterState...#1191941st1 wants to merge 4 commits into
1st1 wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
...as opposed to storing it in PyRuntime. Storing it in PyRuntime is fundametally wrong, as its state contains references to Python objects. Those objects (tuples and strings) can (and will) be picked by various subinterpreter clean up code, leaving PyRuntime with broken pointers.
1st1
commented
May 20, 2024
ericsnowcurrently
changed the title
Eclips4
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
...as opposed to storing it in PyRuntime. Storing it in PyRuntime is fundametally wrong, as its state contains references to Python objects. Those objects (tuples and strings) can (and will) be picked by various subinterpreter clean up code, leaving PyRuntime with broken pointers.