{{ message }}
gh-91048: fix thread safety for asyncio stack introspection APIs#129399
Merged
kumaraditya303 merged 2 commits intoFeb 6, 2025
Merged
gh-91048: fix thread safety for asyncio stack introspection APIs#129399kumaraditya303 merged 2 commits into
kumaraditya303 merged 2 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Merging this as its been sitting idle for over a week now. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
kumaraditya303
commented
Feb 6, 2025
srinivasreddy
pushed a commit
to srinivasreddy/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2025
cmaloney
pushed a commit
to cmaloney/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Changes:
FutureObj *as all the other ones already do. In most cases, we avoid type checking on task which is guaranteed to be task or its subclass.