{{ message }}
bpo-36907: fix refcount bug in _PyStack_UnpackDict()#13381
Merged
encukou merged 2 commits intoMay 22, 2019
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
I decided to increase the refcount in This should probably be backported to 3.7 too. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
encukou
reviewed
May 17, 2019
encukou
reviewed
May 21, 2019
encukou
reviewed
May 21, 2019
7f45962 to
bdea0de
Compare
May 21, 2019 09:29
bdea0de to
c047904
Compare
May 21, 2019 09:44
Contributor
Author
|
Can this be merged please? That would be good for the PEP 590 implementation, which uses this function. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
encukou
approved these changes
May 22, 2019
encukou
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I took the liberty to add a gc.collect() call.
Sorry, something went wrong.
encukou
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
A minimal patch fixing bpo-36907
CC @encukou
https://bugs.python.org/issue36907