{{ message }}
bpo-30302 Make timedelta.__repr__ more informative.#1493
Merged
vstinner merged 26 commits intoJul 25, 2017
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
Loading
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
7 participants
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Currently, the default implementation of datetime.datetime.repr (the default output string produced at the console/IPython) gives a rather cryptic output:
For the uninitiated, it is not obvious that the numeric values here are
days,secondsandmicrosecondrespectively.Would there be any pushback against changing this to:
# datetime.timedelta(days=3114, seconds=28747, microseconds=100000)?
https://bugs.python.org/issue30302