{{ message }}
bpo-37966: Fully implement the UAX #15 quick-check algorithm.#15558
Merged
benjaminp merged 5 commits intoSep 4, 2019
Merged
Conversation
This link doesn't work. Going back through that UAX's history to find the version that was current when this code was added in commit 7a0fedf in 2009-04, we find that that anchor still works in that version: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-29.html#Annex8 It's a section heading "14. Detecting Normalization Forms". Happily the anchor that the corresponding section heading now offers looks much more reasonable -- it's the title of the section -- and so likely to be long-term stable. ("Annex 8" seems like some kind of editing error.) Switch to that.
The purpose of the `unicodedata.is_normalized` function is to answer the question `str == unicodedata.normalized(form, str)` more efficiently than writing just that, by using the "quick check" optimization described in the Unicode standard in UAX python#15. However, it turns out the code doesn't implement the full algorithm from the standard, and as a result we often miss the optimization and end up having to compute the whole normalized string after all. Implement the standard's algorithm. This greatly speeds up `unicodedata.is_normalized` in many cases where our partial variant of quick-check had been returning MAYBE and the standard algorithm returns NO. At a quick test on my desktop, the existing code takes about 4.4 ms/MB (so 4.4 ns per byte) when the partial quick-check returns MAYBE and it has to do the slow normalize-and-compare: $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 50 loops, best of 5: 4.39 msec per loop With this patch, it gets the answer instantly (58 ns) on the same 1 MB string: $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 5000000 loops, best of 5: 58.2 nsec per loop
This restores a small optimization that the original version of this
code had for the `unicodedata.normalize` use case.
With this, that case is actually faster than in master!
$ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \
-- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)'
500 loops, best of 5: 561 usec per loop
$ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \
-- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)'
500 loops, best of 5: 512 usec per loop
benjaminp
reviewed
Aug 29, 2019
benjaminp
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. Looks good. Here are a few nitty comments.
Sorry, something went wrong.
benjaminp
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2019
Contributor
|
Thanks @gnprice for the PR, and @benjaminp for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2019
…orithm. (pythonGH-15558) The purpose of the `unicodedata.is_normalized` function is to answer the question `str == unicodedata.normalized(form, str)` more efficiently than writing just that, by using the "quick check" optimization described in the Unicode standard in UAX pythonGH-15. However, it turns out the code doesn't implement the full algorithm from the standard, and as a result we often miss the optimization and end up having to compute the whole normalized string after all. Implement the standard's algorithm. This greatly speeds up `unicodedata.is_normalized` in many cases where our partial variant of quick-check had been returning MAYBE and the standard algorithm returns NO. At a quick test on my desktop, the existing code takes about 4.4 ms/MB (so 4.4 ns per byte) when the partial quick-check returns MAYBE and it has to do the slow normalize-and-compare: $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 50 loops, best of 5: 4.39 msec per loop With this patch, it gets the answer instantly (58 ns) on the same 1 MB string: $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 5000000 loops, best of 5: 58.2 nsec per loop This restores a small optimization that the original version of this code had for the `unicodedata.normalize` use case. With this, that case is actually faster than in master! $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 561 usec per loop $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 512 usec per loop (cherry picked from commit 2f09413) Co-authored-by: Greg Price <gnprice@gmail.com>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2019
GH-15558) The purpose of the `unicodedata.is_normalized` function is to answer the question `str == unicodedata.normalized(form, str)` more efficiently than writing just that, by using the "quick check" optimization described in the Unicode standard in UAX GH-15. However, it turns out the code doesn't implement the full algorithm from the standard, and as a result we often miss the optimization and end up having to compute the whole normalized string after all. Implement the standard's algorithm. This greatly speeds up `unicodedata.is_normalized` in many cases where our partial variant of quick-check had been returning MAYBE and the standard algorithm returns NO. At a quick test on my desktop, the existing code takes about 4.4 ms/MB (so 4.4 ns per byte) when the partial quick-check returns MAYBE and it has to do the slow normalize-and-compare: $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 50 loops, best of 5: 4.39 msec per loop With this patch, it gets the answer instantly (58 ns) on the same 1 MB string: $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 5000000 loops, best of 5: 58.2 nsec per loop This restores a small optimization that the original version of this code had for the `unicodedata.normalize` use case. With this, that case is actually faster than in master! $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 561 usec per loop $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 512 usec per loop (cherry picked from commit 2f09413) Co-authored-by: Greg Price <gnprice@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for all the reviews and the merge! @benjaminp , I'll go on and send next some of those followups you suggested. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Contributor
Author
Filed bpo-38043 for that, and sent PRs for two of them. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
lisroach
pushed a commit
to lisroach/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2019
…ithm. (pythonGH-15558) The purpose of the `unicodedata.is_normalized` function is to answer the question `str == unicodedata.normalized(form, str)` more efficiently than writing just that, by using the "quick check" optimization described in the Unicode standard in UAX python#15. However, it turns out the code doesn't implement the full algorithm from the standard, and as a result we often miss the optimization and end up having to compute the whole normalized string after all. Implement the standard's algorithm. This greatly speeds up `unicodedata.is_normalized` in many cases where our partial variant of quick-check had been returning MAYBE and the standard algorithm returns NO. At a quick test on my desktop, the existing code takes about 4.4 ms/MB (so 4.4 ns per byte) when the partial quick-check returns MAYBE and it has to do the slow normalize-and-compare: $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 50 loops, best of 5: 4.39 msec per loop With this patch, it gets the answer instantly (58 ns) on the same 1 MB string: $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 5000000 loops, best of 5: 58.2 nsec per loop This restores a small optimization that the original version of this code had for the `unicodedata.normalize` use case. With this, that case is actually faster than in master! $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 561 usec per loop $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 512 usec per loop
DinoV
pushed a commit
to DinoV/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
…ithm. (pythonGH-15558) The purpose of the `unicodedata.is_normalized` function is to answer the question `str == unicodedata.normalized(form, str)` more efficiently than writing just that, by using the "quick check" optimization described in the Unicode standard in UAX python#15. However, it turns out the code doesn't implement the full algorithm from the standard, and as a result we often miss the optimization and end up having to compute the whole normalized string after all. Implement the standard's algorithm. This greatly speeds up `unicodedata.is_normalized` in many cases where our partial variant of quick-check had been returning MAYBE and the standard algorithm returns NO. At a quick test on my desktop, the existing code takes about 4.4 ms/MB (so 4.4 ns per byte) when the partial quick-check returns MAYBE and it has to do the slow normalize-and-compare: $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 50 loops, best of 5: 4.39 msec per loop With this patch, it gets the answer instantly (58 ns) on the same 1 MB string: $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 5000000 loops, best of 5: 58.2 nsec per loop This restores a small optimization that the original version of this code had for the `unicodedata.normalize` use case. With this, that case is actually faster than in master! $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 561 usec per loop $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 512 usec per loop
websurfer5
pushed a commit
to websurfer5/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2020
…ithm. (pythonGH-15558) The purpose of the `unicodedata.is_normalized` function is to answer the question `str == unicodedata.normalized(form, str)` more efficiently than writing just that, by using the "quick check" optimization described in the Unicode standard in UAX python#15. However, it turns out the code doesn't implement the full algorithm from the standard, and as a result we often miss the optimization and end up having to compute the whole normalized string after all. Implement the standard's algorithm. This greatly speeds up `unicodedata.is_normalized` in many cases where our partial variant of quick-check had been returning MAYBE and the standard algorithm returns NO. At a quick test on my desktop, the existing code takes about 4.4 ms/MB (so 4.4 ns per byte) when the partial quick-check returns MAYBE and it has to do the slow normalize-and-compare: $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 50 loops, best of 5: 4.39 msec per loop With this patch, it gets the answer instantly (58 ns) on the same 1 MB string: $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\uf900"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.is_normalized("NFD", s)' 5000000 loops, best of 5: 58.2 nsec per loop This restores a small optimization that the original version of this code had for the `unicodedata.normalize` use case. With this, that case is actually faster than in master! $ build.base/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 561 usec per loop $ build.dev/python -m timeit -s 'import unicodedata; s = "\u0338"*500000' \ -- 'unicodedata.normalize("NFD", s)' 500 loops, best of 5: 512 usec per loop
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
The purpose of the
unicodedata.is_normalizedfunction is to answerthe question
str == unicodedata.normalized(form, str)moreefficiently than writing just that, by using the "quick check"
optimization described in the Unicode standard in UAX #15.
However, it turns out the code doesn't implement the full algorithm
from the standard, and as a result we often miss the optimization and
end up having to compute the whole normalized string after all.
Implement the standard's algorithm. This greatly speeds up
unicodedata.is_normalizedin many cases where our partial variantof quick-check had been returning MAYBE and the standard algorithm
returns NO.
At a quick test on my desktop, the existing code takes about 4.4 ms/MB
(so 4.4 ns per byte) when the partial quick-check returns MAYBE and it
has to do the slow normalize-and-compare:
With this patch, it gets the answer instantly (58 ns) on the same 1 MB
string:
https://bugs.python.org/issue37966