{{ message }}
bpo-38206: Clarify tp_dealloc requirements for heap allocated types.#16248
Merged
miss-islington merged 2 commits intoSep 27, 2019
Merged
bpo-38206: Clarify tp_dealloc requirements for heap allocated types.#16248miss-islington merged 2 commits into
miss-islington merged 2 commits into
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Happy to take any suggestions on the wording. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Contributor
|
Yup! Looks mostly good, just a couple of comments. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Contributor
|
One last comment. This looks good now! Ping @DinoV , could you help getting this merged? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
encukou
reviewed
Sep 24, 2019
73562a2 to
291258b
Compare
September 25, 2019 15:57
eduardo-elizondo
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2019
eduardo-elizondo
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
encukou
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2019
Contributor
|
Thanks @ammaraskar for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2019
…H-16248) As mentioned in the bpo ticket, this mistake came up on two reviews: - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16127GH-pullrequestreview-288312751 - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16071GH-pullrequestreview-287819525 Would be nice to have it documented in a more permanent place than 3.8's whatsnew entry. https://bugs.python.org/issue38206 Automerge-Triggered-By: @encukou (cherry picked from commit 5faff97) Co-authored-by: Ammar Askar <ammar@ammaraskar.com>
jacobneiltaylor
pushed a commit
to jacobneiltaylor/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2019
…ythonGH-16248) As mentioned in the bpo ticket, this mistake came up on two reviews: - python#16127 (review) - python#16071 (review) Would be nice to have it documented in a more permanent place than 3.8's whatsnew entry. https://bugs.python.org/issue38206 Automerge-Triggered-By: @encukou
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
As mentioned in the bpo ticket, this mistake came up on two reviews:
Would be nice to have it documented in a more permanent place than 3.8's whatsnew entry.
https://bugs.python.org/issue38206
Automerge-Triggered-By: @encukou