◐ Shell
reader mode source ↗
Skip to content

[Security][3.4] bpo-26657: Fix Windows directory traversal vulnerability with http.server#226

Closed
vstinner wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.4from
vstinner:issue26657/3.4
Closed

[Security][3.4] bpo-26657: Fix Windows directory traversal vulnerability with http.server#226
vstinner wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.4from
vstinner:issue26657/3.4

Conversation

@vstinner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Issue #26657: Fix Windows directory traversal vulnerability with http.server

Based on patch by Philipp Hagemeister. This fixes a regression caused by revision f4377699fd47.

(cherry picked from commit d274b3f)

http://bugs.python.org/issue26657

Backport to 3.4 the fix of a security vulnerability:
http://python-security.readthedocs.io/vulnerabilities.html#issue-26657

This pull request is based on PR #224. It's the first time that I try to create a PR based on another one. Let's see how it works :-)

….server

Based on patch by Philipp Hagemeister.  This fixes a regression caused by
revision f4377699fd47.

(cherry picked from commit d274b3f)
@vstinner vstinner requested a review from larryhastings March 27, 2017 14:01
@vstinner vstinner changed the title Issue26657/3.4 Mar 27, 2017
@vstinner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Oops, I backported the change twice. I abandon this one in favor of #782

@vstinner vstinner closed this Mar 27, 2017
@vstinner vstinner deleted the issue26657/3.4 branch August 10, 2017 23:37
akruis added a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2019
Apply the workaround from bpo-37788: join the created thread.
akruis added a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request May 27, 2021
Apply the workaround from bpo-37788: join the created thread.

(cherry picked from commit 6e15c22)
jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type-security A security issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants