{{ message }}
bpo-43683: Handle generator entry in bytecode#25138
Merged
markshannon merged 2 commits intoApr 6, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
markshannon
force-pushed
the
handle-generator-entry-in-bytecode
branch
from
4dff1d0 to
46c71f5
Compare
April 2, 2021 10:42
willingc
reviewed
Apr 3, 2021
willingc
left a comment
willingc
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
…o bytecode. Document new bytecode and make it fail gracefully if mis-compiled. Add NEWS item Bump magic number.
markshannon
force-pushed
the
handle-generator-entry-in-bytecode
branch
from
46c71f5 to
1a29ec3
Compare
April 6, 2021 09:56
gvanrossum
reviewed
Apr 6, 2021
gvanrossum
reviewed
Apr 6, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Adds GEN_START bytecode to handle checking for None when starting a generator or coroutine.
This means that:
send()doesn't need to check the state of the generator.https://bugs.python.org/issue43683