{{ message }}
bpo-44032: Move pointer to code object from frame-object to frame specials array.#26771
Merged
markshannon merged 2 commits intoJun 18, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Member
Author
|
Skipping news as this is just making |
Sorry, something went wrong.
ericsnowcurrently
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2021
ericsnowcurrently
left a comment
ericsnowcurrently
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
I left one minor suggestion for simplifying the GDB tooling. Otherwise this looks ready to go.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Member
|
I'm confused about how I'm meant to access the code for a frame now? The struct member is gone, and the accessor function has a leading underscore. Is there a supported way to get to the code for a frame? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Member
|
Oh, sorry, PyFrame_GetCode, got it :) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
The
f_codefield is the last field in the frame object that cannot be lazily evaluated if we want to lazily create frame objects, or ignore them in the interpreter.https://bugs.python.org/issue44032