◐ Shell
reader mode source ↗
Skip to content

[3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048)#27220

Closed
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-bf89ff9-3.10
Closed

[3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048)#27220
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-bf89ff9-3.10

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit bf89ff9)

Co-authored-by: Yurii Karabas 1998uriyyo@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue44490

@uriyyo @miss-islington
bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (pyth… …
4ed37b5 
…onGH-27048)

(cherry picked from commit bf89ff9)

Co-authored-by: Yurii Karabas <1998uriyyo@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2021
Merged
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 3 of 5 required status checks are expected..

@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title [3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title bpo-44490: [3.10] Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title bpo-44490 [3.10]: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@uriyyo and @gvanrossum: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@uriyyo and @gvanrossum: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Required status check "bedevere/news" is expected..

1 similar comment
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Required status check "bedevere/news" is expected..

@gvanrossum

gvanrossum commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry for the spurious title changes. But I fear the news check is stuck?

@Fidget-Spinner

Fidget-Spinner commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry for the spurious title changes. But I fear the news check is stuck?

Yeah I gave up on this PR and opened another one at GH-27222 to rerun that check.

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-bf89ff9-3.10 branch July 18, 2021 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gvanrossum gvanrossum gvanrossum approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting merge

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@miss-islington @gvanrossum @Fidget-Spinner @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot @uriyyo