🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @pablogsal for commit b4149b6d80bc85c73104ca0f98ee3754cf5d485c 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment: I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@markshannon Damn, unfortunately something is going on with Windows:

D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\python.vcxproj(125,5): warning MSB3073: The command "setlocal
D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\python.vcxproj(125,5): warning MSB3073: set PYTHONPATH=D:\a\cpython\cpython\Lib
D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\python.vcxproj(125,5): warning MSB3073: "D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\win32\python.exe" "D:\a\cpython\cpython\PC\validate_ucrtbase.py" ucrtbase" exited with code -1073741819.
D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\python.vcxproj(125,5): warning MSB4181: The "Exec" task returned false but did not log an error.
D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\regen.targets(107,5): error MSB3073: The command "D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\win32\python.exe Programs\freeze_test_frozenmain.py Programs/test_frozenmain.h" exited with code -1073741819. [D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\python.vcxproj]
    6 Warning(s)
    1 Error(s)

Time Elapsed 00:04:54.99

Apparently that is a File System error but I don't understand why this may be happening :(

@markshannon Oh, I found the source of the Windows failure: it was an existing bug in the PREDICT() macro for the code path without computed gotos. Fixed it in 50276ad8813bfd0bb0455d0e699e2ee301071f00

That was challenging to find indeed!

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @pablogsal for commit 50276ad8813bfd0bb0455d0e699e2ee301071f00 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

I cannot reproduce the ASAN bug. :(

There're refleaks but I can't pinpoint where :(

python.exe -m test test_grammar test_builtin -R 3:3
0:00:00 Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 [1/2] test_grammar
beginning 6 repetitions
123456
......
test_grammar leaked [12, 12, 12] references, sum=36
0:00:01 [2/2/1] test_builtin -- test_grammar failed (reference leak)
beginning 6 repetitions
123456
......
test_builtin leaked [13, 13, 13] references, sum=39
test_builtin failed (reference leak)

== Tests result: FAILURE ==

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @pablogsal for commit 0ddc46e25e4885562f7d1e962b9b30eea2b0283d 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

https://wiki.python.org/moin/DebuggingWithGdb

which is quite suboptimal. Maybe I should add a new section to the official docs. I am happy to pack that into this PR but maybe we should do it separately.

What do you think @markshannon ?

I hadn't realized the docs were so sparse. Probably best to do it in another PR.
I've opened https://bugs.python.org/issue45317 so we don't forget.

@markshannon what do you think of 0ddc46e for now? I dislike this approach (is correct, but is difficult to reason about if you don't have the full picture in mind). Should we do the refactor now, should we do a smaller refactor or should we just do some celanup of 0ddc46e ?

@markshannon what do you think of 0ddc46e for now? I dislike this approach (is correct, but is difficult to reason about if you don't have the full picture in mind). Should we do the refactor now, should we do a smaller refactor or should we just do some celanup of 0ddc46e ?

Just do the minimal cleanup of 0ddc46e that you are happy with for now.
And add a comment as to why it is correct.

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @pablogsal for commit 1de88f6 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

@markshannon I had to fix some merge conflicts and I have done the cleanup. I am building again with the buildbot fleet but this should be ready for a first version.

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @pablogsal for commit f313e8c 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

@Fidget-Spinner Thanks for the review!

I am not going to push anything new until the buildbots pass to not restart the long refleak builds yet again. I will fix the formatting issues in a new PR unless @markshannon wants to change something fundamental (I also plan to rename the frame->depth in another PR).

I am not going to push anything new until the buildbots pass to not restart the long refleak builds yet again.

I was just about to mention that. Good call!

Cleanups happening here: #28836

@markshannon After that is merged, I will create a PR to address the counter to convert it to a "entry frame" flag.

This is really cool, nice work @pablogsal ;-)