◐ Shell
reader mode source ↗
Skip to content

bpo-46841: Use inline caching for calls#31709

Merged
brandtbucher merged 9 commits into
python:mainfrom
brandtbucher:inline-call
Mar 7, 2022
Merged

bpo-46841: Use inline caching for calls#31709
brandtbucher merged 9 commits into
python:mainfrom
brandtbucher:inline-call

Conversation

@brandtbucher

@brandtbucher brandtbucher commented Mar 6, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Also:

  • remove the "old" non-inline caching machinery
  • fix some bugs in the collection of PRECALL/CALL specialization stats
  • shrink the cache size requirements for PRECALL/CALL instructions

Next steps tracked at faster-cpython/ideas#310.

https://bugs.python.org/issue46841

@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @markshannon for commit 2021895 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Mar 7, 2022
@markshannon markshannon added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Mar 7, 2022
@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @markshannon for commit 2021895 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Mar 7, 2022

@markshannon markshannon left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hide comment

Excellent.
A couple comments, but nothing to block merging.

@brandtbucher brandtbucher merged commit f193631 into python:main Mar 7, 2022
@brandtbucher brandtbucher deleted the inline-call branch July 21, 2022 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants