bpo-32225: Implementation of PEP 562#4731
Conversation
serhiy-storchaka
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a What's New entry and document this feature in corresponding places.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@ilevkivskyi Nick made a comment on the ticket about adding documentation. @serhiy-storchaka and @merwok would need to let you know if anything else was needed. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
The documentation is required. @ncoghlan given a good suggestion. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
OK, I added docs as proposed by @ncoghlan (I also mentioned |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
And please document PEP 562 in the What's New document. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
serhiy-storchaka
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. But perhaps @ncoghlan has other suggestions about the documentation.
Thanks, this is a nice improvement.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
+1 to merging from me (I haven't actually reviewed the docs updates yet,
but I trust the reviews you've already received, and if I turn out to have
comments after I get back from holidays we can always make further
adjustments later)
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
OK, then I am going to merge this now. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Whee!
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
This is a basic implementation of the PEP. Suggestions are welcome.
@gvanrossum @serhiy-storchaka Can one of you (or both?) please review?
https://bugs.python.org/issue32225