A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@terryjreedy I don't quite understand what changes you'd like me to make. I changed the docstring to match what you asked about on the bug tracker for #1, but I'm not sure what you mean by 'Actually print the methods defined on object.'. Thanks!

Your initial patch fixed the help output. The second has the wording I suggested on the issue. I will expand the news entry a bit.

Absent an even better suggestion, I would like to go with this docstring, resulting from pydev discussion (see the tracker).

"The base class of the class hierarchy.

When called, it accepts no arguments and returns a new featureless instance that has no instance attributes and cannot be given any."

@terryjreedy I've applied the changes. Thanks!

help(object) now looks correct on my machine, after the update merge. Rather than run test suite locally, I pushed to have patch to core object tested with current code on all CI systems. I believe there have been other patches to object.c since last CI run.

Thanks @terryjreedy! It looks like all the CI tests have passed, so I"m going to merge this.