bpo-32769: A new take on annotations/type hinting glossary entries#6829
bpo-32769: A new take on annotations/type hinting glossary entries#6829ilevkivskyi merged 25 commits into
Conversation
…that annotations are not a runtime-only concept
|
@ilevkivskyi I would really appreciate any input, when you have some spare time of course. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
ilevkivskyi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, I lost track a bit, here are few superficial comments. I would rather ask @gvanrossum to take a look at wording here (if he has bandwidth of course).
Sorry, something went wrong.
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ALmost there.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks @andresdelfino for the PR, and @ilevkivskyi for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6, 3.7. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Sorry, @andresdelfino and @ilevkivskyi, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Sorry, @andresdelfino and @ilevkivskyi, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@andresdelfino Could you please make manual backports of these changes? (Make PRs against 3.6 and 3.7 branches). |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Yes, I was working on them already :) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
…ies (pythonGH-6829). (cherry picked from commit 6e33f81) Co-authored-by: Andrés Delfino <adelfino@gmail.com>
…ies (pythonGH-6829). (cherry picked from commit 6e33f81) Co-authored-by: Andrés Delfino <adelfino@gmail.com>
https://bugs.python.org/issue32769