{{ message }}
gh-95913: Edit, link and sort 3.11 WhatsNew Build section#98588
Merged
pablogsal merged 2 commits intoOct 24, 2022
Merged
Conversation
33 tasks
Contributor
|
Thanks @CAM-Gerlach for the PR, and @pablogsal for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2022
…onGH-98588) (cherry picked from commit e81fad6) Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2022
encukou
reviewed
Oct 24, 2022
pablogsal
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2022
pablogsal
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Part of #95913
This PR copyedits, sorts and fixes/improves the syntax, cross references and links of the Build section of the What's New in Python 3.11 document. In particular, it:
While I did read through the various Build changes in the changelog, and quite a few appeared to be of a similar magnitude to those added here, given this is not an area of my expertise and it would substantially delay the review of this PR, I elected to defer that until later.