◐ Shell
reader mode source ↗
Skip to content

Integracion con padpoes#1785

Open
Bgeninatti wants to merge 4 commits into
python:3.13from
Bgeninatti:integracion-con-padpoes
Open

Integracion con padpoes#1785
Bgeninatti wants to merge 4 commits into
python:3.13from
Bgeninatti:integracion-con-padpoes

Conversation

@Bgeninatti

@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti commented Dec 21, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Integra la herramienta padpoes a los github actions.

Esta herramienta sirve para agregar una serie de revisiones automáticas en los PR:

Los inline-comments son creados utilizando github problem-matchers

@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti marked this pull request as draft December 21, 2021 19:50
@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti force-pushed the integracion-con-padpoes branch 2 times, most recently from 1d7392e to af5da3d Compare December 21, 2021 20:00
@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2021 23:46
@cmaureir

cmaureir commented Oct 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hola @Bgeninatti una pregunta.
Si habilitamos esto solo marcará las entradas fuzzy, vacias, memoria, etc o fallará el build?

Tenemos el caso ahora con 3.11 que tenemos que dejar unas entradas en fuzzy para que el build pase.

@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti force-pushed the integracion-con-padpoes branch from 2b389fe to 5c1cb60 Compare October 30, 2022 22:41
@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti changed the base branch from 3.10 to 3.11 October 30, 2022 22:42
@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti force-pushed the integracion-con-padpoes branch from 5c1cb60 to 46ebbe4 Compare October 30, 2022 22:53
@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti force-pushed the integracion-con-padpoes branch from 46ebbe4 to a5293a5 Compare October 31, 2022 00:11
@Bgeninatti

Bgeninatti commented Oct 31, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hola @cmaureir !

Hice un rebase con la rama 3.11 y pasa el build.

Estuve revisando el caso el problema reportado en #1845

Entiendo que siempre que haya una entrada que contiene el string :ref:Availability <availability> hay que marcarlo como fuzzy. Es así?

Se me ocurre que podemos agregar un chequeo en padpoes para poner una revisión automática en esas entradas como esta #2110 (comment)

que te parece?

@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti force-pushed the integracion-con-padpoes branch from a5293a5 to 1ad5561 Compare October 31, 2022 01:22
@cmaureir cmaureir changed the base branch from 3.11 to 3.12 October 14, 2023 11:46
@cmaureir cmaureir changed the base branch from 3.12 to 3.13 November 21, 2024 20:49
@cacrespo

cacrespo commented Feb 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Amigazo @Bgeninatti ! ¿cómo va eso?
Estoy barriendo los PRs para prepararnos para la migración a 3.14. Veo que esto tiene mil años. ¿Crees que vale la pena mantenerlo abierto / tratar de implementarlo? ¿O podemos cerrarlo sin problemas?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@Bgeninatti @cmaureir @cacrespo @brunildisimo