◐ Shell
reader mode source ↗
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20080818041819/http://www.thestar.com:80/News/Canada/article/478887

thestar.com Web find a Business
Advanced Search | Full Text Article Archive
TheStar.com | Canada | Liberal Green Shift is 'green shaft,' says Harper
Liberal Green Shift is 'green shaft,' says Harper
Aug 14, 2008 09:17 PM

THE CANADIAN PRESS

FREDERICTON–Prime Minister Stephen Harper took aim at the Liberal party's carbon tax policy today, suggesting the so-called Green Shift proposal is really a "green shaft" that will stifle the Canadian economy.

Harper, wrapping up a two-day tour of Newfoundland and New Brunswick, described the Liberal policy document as a "hidden agenda" that is finally out in the open.

In a campaign-style speech to about 400 party supporters, Harper told Conservatives the carbon tax will be a major bone of contention in the next federal election – one that will clearly separate Tories and Grits.

"We have got to fight it with everything we've got," Harper said in a partisan speech at a Fredericton hotel.

"Put simply, we cannot let the Liberals take this country back to the tax-and-spend policies of the past."

Harper said the Liberal policy was a tax increase masquerading as environmental policy.

"It will drive up the price of everything – transportation, groceries, electricity, heating, even propane for our BBQs," he said.

He said the policy would hurt the Canadian middle class while making the cost of living "unbearable" for fixed-income seniors and low-income families.

The Liberals say Harper is misrepresenting their key policy, stressing that the carbon tax will be largely offset by income- and business-tax breaks, which the Conservatives fail to mention.

The complicated climate-change plan would also offer tax benefits to the poor, elderly and rural dwellers.

Harper's speech highlighted Tory accomplishments stretching back to Confederation, and the prime minister boasted that he now presides over the longest-serving minority government in Canadian history.

He reminded the crowd that his government is committed to cutting taxes, getting tough on crime, paying down the debt, strengthening the military and reinforcing sovereignty over the Arctic.

Meanwhile, he said the country's economic fundamentals are strong, with low and stable interest rates and inflation, high employment levels and a balanced budget.

Earlier in the day, in a speech to the Conservative Atlantic caucus at a meeting west of Fredericton, Harper claimed the Liberals failed to mention the Green Shift in a statement issued after they concluded their own Atlantic caucus meeting last week in Nova Scotia.

"There's a reason it didn't mention the carbon tax policy," he said. "That's because it's a bad policy for Atlantic Canada. It would hurt families here, it would hurt industries here and that's why they're not talking about it."

Before heading to New Brunswick, Harper fuelled election speculation after a funding announcement in Newfoundland by obliquely musing about the possibility of engineering the defeat of his own government.

In Newfoundland and again in New Brunswick, he suggested Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion is responsible for creating chaos in Parliament and he urged his foe to make up his mind about whether the Conservatives should continue governing.

"I see Mr. Dion has been threatening to defeat the government again this summer – I am starting to feel like I am starring alongside Bill Murray in the movie Groundhog Day," he said.

"As humorous as Mr. Dion's behaviour has been, this spectacle of his threatening to defeat the government, then backing down, has to end."

– with files from Michael MacDonald in Halifax.

We are all Hobbits

Politicians treat voters like children on this issue offering two options: Cap and Trade or Carbon Tax. What about the third way - listen to the science? It is the sun, stupid. Leave the carbon economy in place. Problem however, is the intellectual construct of "BIG OIL". The state of affairs, actually is that "REALLY BIG OIL", the national oil companies like Russia and Venezuela and all the rest of the incompetent, and uncompetitive national oil companies (PEMEX) have driven prices through the roof by incompetence. They sit on 93% of the resources and reserves. The Canada and the US are suffering from NIMBY for certain, but gas in Europe is about $10.00 a gallon equivalent and rising for the same reason NIMBY refineries.

Posted by ArtEsian at 10:53 AM Sunday, August 17 2008

Is CO2 really that bad?

We all exhale C02 every time we breathe out. Plants need CO2 to live. When did one of the very substances of life on this planet get hijacked by celebs and politicians as something bad???

Posted by ezbeatz at 4:34 PM Saturday, August 16 2008

How does the Liberal "Green Shift" reduce CO2??

One can argue all they want about what the politically correct direction one wants to take the country, but the fact remains that Dion has not explained how ONE ton of CO2 will be reduced through his program. It is clearly a wealth shift, a tax shift and an economic shift plan, developed to fund social programs. That political debate is a whole other matter, but it does not address CO2 emissions. For anyone who knows, please CLEARLY outline how the Green Shift tax shift plan will reduce ANY CO2. I know all the platitudes about "we need to do something", but this does not "do something"... it pretends.

Posted by cupper at 3:25 PM Saturday, August 16 2008

home

why is it all of your comments smack of totalitarianism. "Lets do something nasty to those who voted for someone different to me". Really mature for someone who is most likely over 50

Posted by kinski at 11:06 AM Saturday, August 16 2008

CO2 red herring stinks in Denmark

As I understand it, the hypothesis of the Danish National Space Center goes as follows: Active sun ? Enhanced magnetic and thermal flux = solar wind ? Geomagnetic shield response ? Less low-level clouds? less albedo (less heat reflected) ? Warmer climate Quiet sun? Reduced magnetic and thermal flux = reduced solar wind ? Geomagnetic shield drops ? Galactic cosmic ray flux? More low-level clouds and more snow? More albedo effect (more heat reflected) ? Colder climate That is how the bulk of climate change might work, coupled with (modulated by) sunspot peak frequency there are cycles of global warming and cooling like waves in the ocean. When the waves are closely spaced, the planets warm; when the waves are spaced farther apart, the planets cool. CO2 is a necessary greenhouse gas, plant food and plant fertilizer. Water vapour is far more important than CO2 and now appears to be a negative feedback by clouding over, raining, snowing, and cooling the planet in many regions.

Posted by ArtEsian at 9:00 AM Saturday, August 16 2008

Simply Another Tax

Get real. You'd think that people would learn after virtually years of Liberal taxation after taxation. The Liberals only objective is to tax us further to better fill up their own back pockets.

Posted by Marilyn at 8:19 AM Saturday, August 16 2008

support carbon tax at all costs?

I understand how ppl like the carbon tax.I think its a big step for ppl to realize CO2 emissions should be cut.I don't understand why we feel we have to back Dion's plan no matter what the cost.Europe has done good things but their policies are much more strict with forcing the polluters to clean up than ours.True, Harper has done nothing and that's terrible, but that doesn't mean we should jump on Dion's bandwagon and start paying up a carbon tax that doesn't necessarily force the big polluters to clean up.Natural gas companies,for example,jack up their transportation rates to offset energy costs,what makes you think it'll be any different that they'll do that to offset their carbon taxes?It's only a win-win situation if Dion blocks polluters and utilities from passing on their tax payments to us.You want to do something good, then demand Dion put some teeth on this plan that doesn't force you to pay for the polluters.

Posted by gg75 at 3:45 PM Friday, August 15 2008

Good economics, good environment

First off, if you are one of those people who believe that all taxes are bad, then there is no way you'll understand this: Economist are pretty much unanimous that taxes on employment, investment and savings are bad. Taxes on consumption, waste, pollution and vices are good. A carbon tax is good because it forces individuals and companies to be more efficient by properly pricing a resource (our atmosphere in this case). It's good for the economy in the long term and it's good for the environment. It's a win win (loss for polluters who think they're entitled to pollute at no cost).

Posted by SydneyCarton at 11:36 AM Friday, August 15 2008

re: what's complicated

I have to disagree with you. You cannot simply support an environmental policy because it's there. Forget about your political leanings and actually read this ridiculous plan. It addresses penalties for creating carbon for the companies but guess what, it doesn't force the companies necessarily to curb their habits. Do you think your Hydro company is going to invest in research to clean up their act or do you think they will tack on surcharges to your monthly bill to offset their carbon tax payment? Its not just the utilities, its also goes for goods that you buy, groceries, etc. The income tax break that Dion is promising is in no way going to offset the extra costs that we are going to pay to make this green shaft plan work. Harper is lucky that Dion is such a weak leader because he doesn't even have to provide an alternative plan. Don't vote for something because its better than nothing, demand something better from a leader!

Posted by gg75 at 11:04 AM Friday, August 15 2008

and the Conservative plan is...?

While England is rolling out electric cars and investing in huge wind generating projects at sea (as are Norway and Denmark), Germany is cleaning up their industrial polluters and other European countries expand rail networks to get cars off the road, Harper's idea of leadership is to stand up at the recent climate summit in Japan and declaim that there is no point in doing anything unless everyone participates. He and his jackal, John Baird, are an international laughing stock. He can knock the Liberal plan all he wants but he has yet to come up with anything better. Canadians will not be duped by Harper's Republican smear tactics. He has brought Canadian politics and Canada's international reputation to an all time low.

Posted by Brian S. at 10:51 AM Friday, August 15 2008

re: home

Your suggestion makes no sense. Why would you let the heaviest polluters in Albert (non-Liberal territory) get off scott free? Ridiculous. While we're at it why don't we get the carbon tax from those Liberal areas and give it to Alberta? Great idea home...

Posted by Shaun C at 9:36 AM Friday, August 15 2008

Oh come on Harpo

and you are in bed with George Bush... doesn't Mr. David Frum work for you now?.. so tit for tat... figure out how to govern and stop the finger pointing cause yours is red white and blue verses green. So what!

Posted by Peter Pointer at 9:26 AM Friday, August 15 2008

Page 1 of 2 < Prev Next >
SPECIAL
Most pop-star life spans are measurable in a couple of years, if not mere months. In that context, then, the 50th birthdays ...
Ontario's Technical Standards and Safety Authority released a revised list of the province's propane facilities Friday. Here are ...
The Canadian National Exhibition returns with new thrills, top musical acts and an exhibit dedicated to the history of the toilet. We have ...
Penelope Cruz co-stars in Woody Allen's Vicky Cristina Barcelona. Read the review on our Movies page.