Message 106565 - Python tracker

Message106565

Author	brett.cannon
Recipients	ajaksu2, belopolsky, brett.cannon, doerwalter, eric.araujo, ggenellina, kawai, pitrou, rafe, vstinner
Date	2010-05-26.18:25:00
SpamBayes Score	0.010671251
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1274898301.6.0.0536210230163.issue5094@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
PyPy has said over the years they plan to commit their version of datetime, they just need to get around to it. I just figured that we could use this opportunity to prepare for it. But if people want to do the C version first, that's fine as they will be the ones writing the patch. I just thought that if someone would rather write a patch to create datetime.py now along with a pure Python version of the proposed class they could.

Content

PyPy has said over the years they plan to commit their version of datetime, they just need to get around to it. I just figured that we could use this opportunity to prepare for it. But if people want to do the C version first, that's fine as they will be the ones writing the patch. I just thought that if someone would rather write a patch to create datetime.py now along with a pure Python version of the proposed class they could.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-05-26 18:25:01	brett.cannon	set	recipients: + brett.cannon, doerwalter, belopolsky, ggenellina, pitrou, vstinner, ajaksu2, kawai, eric.araujo, rafe
2010-05-26 18:25:01	brett.cannon	set	messageid: <1274898301.6.0.0536210230163.issue5094@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-05-26 18:25:00	brett.cannon	link	issue5094 messages
2010-05-26 18:25:00	brett.cannon	create