Message 129879 - Python tracker

Message129879

Author	pitrou
Recipients	Aaron.Sherman, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2011-03-02.12:09:12
SpamBayes Score	7.280299e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1299067750.3722.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<1299066786.63.0.510929898728.issue11314@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> subprocess_errpipe_buffer.patch: Patch for 2.7 which improve by 30% > the dummy benchmark (run /bin/false 10,000 times). It avoids the > creation of the 1 MB buffer: start with a buffer of a single byte > (just to check if there is data or if the pipe was closed). Does it improve on non-dummy benchmarks? Otherwise I don't think it's worth the trouble.

Content

> subprocess_errpipe_buffer.patch: Patch for 2.7 which improve by 30%
> the dummy benchmark (run /bin/false 10,000 times). It avoids the
> creation of the 1 MB buffer: start with a buffer of a single byte
> (just to check if there is data or if the pipe was closed).

Does it improve on non-dummy benchmarks? Otherwise I don't think it's
worth the trouble.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-03-02 12:09:13	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, neologix, Aaron.Sherman
2011-03-02 12:09:12	pitrou	link	issue11314 messages
2011-03-02 12:09:12	pitrou	create