Message 153450 - Python tracker
Message153450
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, spiv |
| Date | 2012-02-15.23:41:47 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.004588019 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1329349308.61.0.970204461155.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I just remembered that many of the urllib.urlparse tests are guilty of only reporting the first case that fails, instead of testing everything and reporting all failures: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Lib/test/test_urlparse.py IMO, it would make a good guinea pig for any upgrade to the stdlib support for parameterised unit tests. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-02-15 23:41:48 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, spiv, exarkun, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow |
| 2012-02-15 23:41:48 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1329349308.61.0.970204461155.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-02-15 23:41:48 | ncoghlan | link | issue7897 messages |
| 2012-02-15 23:41:47 | ncoghlan | create | |