> I was just attempting to provide a standard way of marking unreachable code.
I'm -1 for the proposed patch (and probably -0 on the general idea). I think the patch has the potential *introducing* new warnings, as compilers might warn that a return is lacking in these functions.
I'm -0 on the general idea, as I think the status quo is just fine.
As for Victor's second use case (run-time checking that supposedly-unreachable code is indeed not reached, in release mode), I'm -0 also: we check that in debug mode; this looks sufficient to me.