> This change is specifically aimed at code objects.
> As it is, it is impossible to produce code objects that share common
> data (e.g. filename strings, common tuples, name strings, etc) that
> don't unserialize to separate objects.
Shouldn't strings be interned when the code object is unmarshalled?
> This change is based on work done at CCP to reduce the size of
> compiled code in memory. Simple preprocessing of code objects prior
> to writing them to disk can result in important memory savings.
How important?