Message 189814 - Python tracker
Message189814
| Author | oscarbenjamin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jeffrey.Armstrong, Martin.Fiers, Pete.Forman, RubyTuesdayDONO, Seppo.Yli-Olli, alexis, cmcqueen1975, danmbox, doko, eric.araujo, geertj, jonforums, jwilk, loewis, oscarbenjamin, paul.moore, pje, rpetrov, rubenvb, santoso.wijaya, schmir, tarek |
| Date | 2013-05-22.13:23:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAHVvXxRLcMKDnVa++XJCsjLJsCexcQ9PJq6HnohKpgccH4Dqzw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <CAHVvXxQR_10reJCOE3tP86P+a2HR3ZCLqRDGx-duut8fzzvPsA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On 22 May 2013 13:40, Oscar Benjamin <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > However on further reflection I'm a little reluctant to force an error > if I can't *prove* that the setup is broken. After a little more reflection I realise that we could just do: if self.gcc_version < '4' or is_cygwingcc(): # use -mno-cygwin This way the cygwin/gcc-4 error is still emitted only if gcc emits it. If the is_cygwingcc() function is conservative then there could be cases where it mistakenly does not use -mno-cygwin but that would have to be a broken cygwin/gcc-4 setup anyway. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-05-22 13:23:08 | oscarbenjamin | set | recipients: + oscarbenjamin, loewis, doko, paul.moore, pje, geertj, schmir, tarek, jwilk, eric.araujo, rpetrov, cmcqueen1975, rubenvb, santoso.wijaya, alexis, Seppo.Yli-Olli, jonforums, RubyTuesdayDONO, Jeffrey.Armstrong, danmbox, Martin.Fiers, Pete.Forman |
| 2013-05-22 13:23:08 | oscarbenjamin | link | issue12641 messages |
| 2013-05-22 13:23:08 | oscarbenjamin | create | |