Message 196081 - Python tracker

Message196081

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	christian.heimes, jcea, leim, macfreek, ncoghlan, pmoody, santoso.wijaya, terry.reedy
Date	2013-08-24.15:03:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1377356595.85.0.880570551558.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Reopening this - rewording the issue title to cover the problem to be solved (i.e. accounting for RFC 6598 addresses) rather than a specific solution (which isn't appropriate, since the RFC explicitly states that shared addresses and private addresses aren't the same thing) It seems to me that the simplest solution would be to use the terminology from RFC 6598 and add a new "is_shared" attribute to addresses.

Content

Reopening this - rewording the issue title to cover the problem to be solved (i.e. accounting for RFC 6598 addresses) rather than a specific solution (which isn't appropriate, since the RFC *explicitly* states that shared addresses and private addresses aren't the same thing)

It seems to me that the simplest solution would be to use the terminology from RFC 6598 and add a new "is_shared" attribute to addresses.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-08-24 15:03:15	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, terry.reedy, jcea, macfreek, christian.heimes, pmoody, santoso.wijaya, leim
2013-08-24 15:03:15	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1377356595.85.0.880570551558.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-08-24 15:03:15	ncoghlan	link	issue17400 messages
2013-08-24 15:03:15	ncoghlan	create