> I don't think io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE makes much sense as a heuristic for the gzip module (or compressed files in general). Perhaps gzip should get its own DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE?
Do you mean from a namespace point of vue, or from a performance point of view?
Because this size is used to read/write from underlying the file
object, so using the io default would make sense, no?
Sure, it might not be optimal for compressed files, but I gues that
the optimal value is function of the compression-level block size and
many other factors which are just too varied to come up with a
reasonable heuristic.