Message 261028 - Python tracker
Message261028
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Sriram Rajagopalan, belopolsky, gregory.p.smith |
| Date | 2016-02-29.22:54:41 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1456786481.55.0.114298759742.issue26460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Python's time.strptime() behavior is consistent with that of glibc 2.19 Gregory, I believe OP is complaining about the way datetime.datetime.strptime() behaves, not time.strptime() which is mentioned as (preferred?) alternative. See msg261015 in issue 14157 for context. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-02-29 22:54:41 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, gregory.p.smith, Sriram Rajagopalan |
| 2016-02-29 22:54:41 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1456786481.55.0.114298759742.issue26460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-02-29 22:54:41 | belopolsky | link | issue26460 messages |
| 2016-02-29 22:54:41 | belopolsky | create | |